Professor Field’s interest lies in the proletarian literature movement
of the 1920s and 30s in Japan, and her talk centered on an amalgamation of Marxism,
environmentalism, literature, class distinctions, and the repercussions of
nuclear disaster. In particular, her lecture hinged on a dichotomy between life
and livelihood; those without resources must choose between their personal
health and safety and the ability to put food on the table. This is especially
relevant in Japan, as the Fukushima catastrophe intensified the gravity of this
choice. Through a mixture of anecdotes, statistics and summaries of stories
from Kobayashi’s oeuvre, Prof. Field sought to demonstrate that the nuclear
disaster has put even more pressure on the lower class people who are already
struggling, further exemplifying the idea that the people who most need a
movement are in a position of being least able to participate in it. This
results in both an inability to escape one’s predicament as well as resentment
towards those who do have the luxury to protest the goings-on (specifically,
the Tokyo-ites who travel to the Tomari nuclear plant in Hokkaido to hold
rallies). Adding to these concerns are of course the health problems following
from radiation from the nuclear plants.